Can't Go Home Again

topic posted Wed, May 10, 2006 - 1:08 PM by 
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
I love rereading books. I have some I've reread every few years since I was in high school. Often, I wait long enough so I forget the plot, so I can enjoy the story all over again. It's also interesting to pick up a book I loved several years ago and haven't read since, to see how my perceptions have changed.

Most of the time, I still love the book for the same reasons I once did. But every now and again, I just can't go home again, and I wince upon reread, wondering what I ever saw in it.

One such example: Poppy Z. Brite's Lost Souls. I loved that book in the early '90s: the edgy eroticism, the rich dank atmosphere she evoked, and her quirky, sympathetic portrayals of youth subculture. It suited my mood and the atmosphere of the time.

So I just started to reread it and man, her prose sucks. She really adores some favorite stupid phrases, like "smelled like blood and altars," and she takes clove cigarettes seriously. How could anybody have ever thought that there was anything appealing or sexy about vampires and the dreary children who wanted to be like them? Gah. It was kind of a shock, actually.

Anybody have a similar experience with a recent reread?
posted by:
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Can't Go Home Again

    Wed, May 10, 2006 - 2:25 PM
    "How could anybody have ever thought that there was anything appealing or sexy about vampires and the dreary children who wanted to be like them? Gah."

    Haha! That's a bit how I feel about "decadent" authors like Huysmans and Villiers de L'Isle-Adam now that I'm an adult. As a young teenager I adored their rich, baroquely descriptive prose, the atmosphere of outrageous but slowly decaying luxury their protagonists inhabited, the perfervid emotion and symbol-laden sexuality, all lashed together with intimations of fetishes and perversions my youthful imagination, lacking any actual knowledge or explicit facts, embroidered into opulent tapestries of forbidden pleasure and sin. (Geez! Just look what even reminiscing about them does to my prose! ;-p )

    I reread 'La-Bas' and 'Contes Crueles' a few years ago and was immediately struck by how threadbare the stories were-actual plot was at a minimum and what plot did exist was generally just recycled early Gothic in Victorian dress. The descriptions now seem campy: amusing for a page or two but then tiresome and absurdly overblown. There's no character development of any kind; the protagonist and those he interacts with are simply mannequins upon whom the author hangs his fetish of choice. Introspection and psychological astuteness are virtually nil. The world these books depict is one in which perception and sensing are everything and the only actions are reactions-even while committing the most taboo acts (ooohhh, lighting black candles...aaahhh, inhaling the fragrance of "poisonous" orchids for a cheap high...) the protagonists are essentially passive because they're essentially mindless, their actions apparently instinctual.

    Curiously, I reread some of the works of Barbey d'Aurevilly at the same time as the above, and while generally classed among the same group as Huysmans, etc. and by no means a great or classic author, Barbey's best work points up the shortcomings of his peers quite clearly. Barbey's characters *act* and when they react their reactions reflect their psychological makeup, not merely instinct. Personalities in Barbey's literary world are strong and distinct; some are even unforgettable. There is no character in all of French literature quite like Hauteclaire Stassin, the coolly willful, unabashedly sensual, fiercely independent fencing mistress who dominates the supposedly objective narrator, her hopelessly smitten lover, and ultimately the tale itself ('Le Bonheur dans le Crime' one of six tales in Barbey's most famous work, 'Les Diaboliques'.) Barbey's prose is luxurious, even overripe, but it adorns the story rather than existing as an end in itself. His world is strange, dark, and hothouse humid with ardent emotions and steamy passions, but it's still recognizeable. It's easy to imagine it's out there, somewhere, lurking behind the bright lights and orderly facades of even our modern cities and suburbs.

    P.S. Don't get me started on Swinburne ;-p
    • JM
      JM
      offline 98

      Re: Can't Go Home Again

      Wed, May 10, 2006 - 4:35 PM
      Hmm.
      The main thing that changes for me (and this is kind of embarassing to admit) is my MORAL judgements of characters.
      People I liked turn into assholes (Giovanni's Room). Poor innocent cuckolded husbands turn into naive, dundering fools (The Good Soldier, Manon Lescault). Cold, unsentimental narrators turn into heart-broken romantics (The Sun Also Rises), assholes become misguided romantics (The Red and the Black) and people I thought were romantic become out-of-control basket cases (Madame Bovary).
      The only thing that comes to mind as sitting still is Dostoyevski and Melville and RM Berry characters.

      But now MT's given me a new reading list....

Recent topics in "Literacy Nerds"