What about a Faulkner tribe?

topic posted Tue, January 23, 2007 - 4:03 AM by  Gerard
Would anyone feel entitled to moderate a Faulkner tribe, because I don't: I'm in the middle of "Absalom! Absalom! and find it amazing and would love to discuss this stuff with people who know more about it than I do...
posted by:
Gerard
France
  • Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

    Tue, January 23, 2007 - 11:34 AM

    Don't sweat the "worthiness" issue; there is none. If you'd like to see a Faulkner interest tribe and you cannot find an already existing one, or one that you like, start one. You may find that in doing so, you will learn a great deal more about the man and his craft than you could in your own studies.
    Moderators are at their best when they suggest a topic or two to get the ball rolling, use minimal guidance to keep conversation on track (but only where absolutely needed), and get out of the way. The less often you call attention to yourself as anything other than another member of the tribe, the more fun you'll have with it.

    You don't need an encyclopedic knowledge of drunk Welsh poets to appreciate Dylan Thomas. ;o)
    • Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

      Tue, January 23, 2007 - 12:40 PM
      I have a TS Eliot tribe and a Beckett tribe. They're ultra-low traffic, but they're fun to have. There are also Joyce and Lorca tribes.

      I'm considering a modernist women tribe or even a Gertrude Stein one, but they might end up being tiny.

      You might also start a thread on barnaby's Modernism tribe, just to see what kind of a discussion you can generate. I'm too distracted to post a link to it now, but you can find it on my tribe list.
      • Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

        Sun, February 11, 2007 - 8:17 PM
        Sorry no opinion on a Faulkner tribe.

        BUT

        Shannon - please start a mod fem tribe, the more i find out about Stein the more i want to find out about her... there is a V Woolf tribe but no mod fem tribe.
  • Unsu...
     

    Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

    Tue, January 23, 2007 - 2:45 PM

    I'm not sure new tribes do anything more than dilute the occupied tribes, anymore. Better to add discussion threads where people respond, I think.
    • Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

      Tue, January 23, 2007 - 2:54 PM
      Enh, I'm not sure I agree. It's not like tribes are a zero-sum conversation, where discussion in one saps it from another.

      It depends on all sorts of other intangibles, like group dynamics, and whatever random thing sets off sparks.

      I've been on some totally dead tribes for awhile now. I like them. They're decorative, and they're full of people whose conversation I would enjoy, and mean to enjoy whenever they start up with it again.

      In any case, there's no rules about tribes, and moderating them isn't really work. As was already said, just suggest topics every now and again, stay out of the way and tidy up the rare oddment of spam if it should occur.
      • Re: What about a Faulkner tribe?

        Wed, January 24, 2007 - 6:10 AM
        Hello.

        I really like your reactivity and didn't expect to spark off such a debate.

        I still don't feel like setting up the Faulkner tribe myself, but I like the idea of "starting a thread" or two somewhere else. Finding the right place is not always that easy, but I suppose I can try the same thread in several different tribes and see what happens.

        I must look for that Beckett tribe.
  • What about some Faulkner quotes?

    Thu, February 8, 2007 - 2:43 PM
    how about some juicy faulkner quotes?

    here's one:

    They entered the kitchen where a lamp burned. "You'll have to excuse
    the way I look," the woman said. She went to the box behind the
    stove and drew it out and stood above it, her hands hidden in the
    front of her garment. Bendow stood in the middle of the room. "I
    have to keep him in the box so the rats can't get to him," she said.
    "What?" Benbow said. "What is it?" He approached, where he could
    see into the box. It contained a sleeping child, not a year old. He
    looked down at the pinched face quietly.
    "Oh," he said. "You have a son."

Recent topics in "Literacy Nerds"