Time's Top 100 Novels

topic posted Tue, October 18, 2005 - 1:00 PM by 
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
www.time.com/time/2005/1...te_list.html

Thoughts? I thought it was a surpisingly good list--much better than others I've seen. I've actually read and enjoyed many of the ones listed.
posted by:
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

    Tue, October 18, 2005 - 1:43 PM
    I've read or watched the following which is a pretty pale version of the bigger list. Some of these are interesting, like Snowcrash, which I thought was great, but wonder why it got the nod for top 100. Wonder if the gathering was a sci-fi buff. There are several on the list.

    The Catcher in the Rye, J.D. Salinger
    A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess
    Deliverance, James Dickey
    The French Lieutenant's Woman, John Fowles
    Gone With the Wind, Margaret Mitchell
    The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck
    I, Claudius, Robert Graves
    The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, C.S. Lewis
    Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov
    Lord of the Flies, William Golding
    The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien
    Mrs. Dalloway, Virginia Woolf
    Naked Lunch, William Burroughs
    Neuromancer, William Gibson
    1984, George Orwell
    One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Ken Kesey
    Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut
    Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson
    The Sound and the Fury, William Faulkner
    To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
    • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

      Tue, October 18, 2005 - 4:53 PM
      It's about what you'd expect from Time. Even the SF lean is predictably mediocre. I mean, "Neuromancer," but not "Stranger in a Strange Land"? "The Big Sleep" isn't Chandler's best, "White Noise" is hysterical and longwinded and "Deliverance" overrated.

      Still, it's nice to see "Ubik," "Red Harvest" and "At Swim-Two-Birds" on the list. Those surprised me.
  • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

    Tue, October 25, 2005 - 1:44 PM
    A compilation of the best of the worst… about the best.

    The following are excerpts from actual one-star Amazon.com reviews of books from Time’s list of the 100 best novels from 1923 to the present. Hilarious!

    www.themorningnews.org/archiv...nts.php
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

      Tue, October 25, 2005 - 2:18 PM
      *Laughing...yeah, I've seen tons of bad reviews of "The Great Gatsby" and "The Grapes of Wrath", especially. Some of them were downright hateful.
    • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

      Tue, October 25, 2005 - 5:29 PM
      >>The following are excerpts from actual one-star Amazon.com reviews of books from Time’s list of the 100 best novels from 1923 to the present. Hilarious!

      Sigh. I'm willing to bet that about 90% of those reviews are from students. It seems to be the trend among some composition teachers these days to assign an amazon review. These comments are extremely typical of far too much of student writing. These are the sorts of initial responses to literature I get all the time.
    • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

      Tue, October 25, 2005 - 10:46 PM
      HAHA!! I swear, sometimes I look up books I love on Amazon in order to read the bad reviews. Then I judge the people who hated my favorites. I suppose there are healthier ways to amuse myself...
  • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

    Tue, October 25, 2005 - 4:26 PM
    Interesting, I have a few comments. I wonder how much some of these were influenced by movies rather than books. For example, A Clockwork Orange and One Flew Over the Cuckoos nest. I thought with those 2 that the movies had more impact that the bokos. For example Singing in the Rain in Clockwork Orange is burnt into my brain and Jack Nicholson made Cuckoo's Nest into one of those movies that is etched into my brain.

    The Hobbitt and LOTR were a series that I started escaping into at 9 years of age and were a wonderful fantasy world and I have to say that fellow Kiwi Peter Jackson really did them justice in his movies.

    It was great to see Philip K Dick in there, but where were Heinlein, Clarke and Asimov? The laws of Robotics will probably come into being one day and we know where they started. I agree with Rockstar, when I thought of classics that I grokked, Stranger in a Strange Land was right up there at the top of my list.

    Other classics which amazed me with their absence were Kafka's The Trial and Metamorphosis (which spawned many movies), Hemingway's Old Man and the Sea was especially surprising when on the same web page Ernest's picture was shown on the cover. Finally I would have added Frank Herbet, at least for the Dune series. What a shame that his son couldn't enthrall me in the same way with his ongoing books of the series.

    Time really should have consulted us before they put this list together:)
  • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

    Sun, December 11, 2005 - 2:14 PM
    Trouble with these so-called Of All Time Lists is this: Time Keeps Moving Onward. So, it makes sense to say "...Up To This Point, In Our Opinions" in a box someplace on the cover.
    • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

      Wed, December 21, 2005 - 8:39 AM
      I wonder if there are any top 100s from around 1900. Would be an interesting comparison.

      But to be fair to Time (the magazine, not the thing that passes as we speak), they didn't claim to be "of all Time." They made it clear it writing in English of a particular period of time. And they also provide a second list produced that makes it clear that biases (especially when you look at the non-fiction list) can "slip in" to these things.

      But I find some of these lists useful. I don't use them to decide what book is better than another, but that they appear on such lists means they are probably at least checking out. I would not have stumbled on some of my current reading ("A Room of One's Own" and "Guns of August", for example) for a while without it.
      • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

        Wed, December 21, 2005 - 8:45 AM
        Please insert the phrases at the appropriate place in the above and get me some more coffee:

        clear it WAS writing in
        list produced BY OTHER "RULES" that makes
        at least WORTH checking out
        • Re: Time's Top 100 Novels

          Wed, December 21, 2005 - 9:16 AM
          IMHO, East of Eden is a better Steinbeck book then Grapes of Wrath. The Spy Who Came inFrom the Cold seems to be very popular with the critics but I think it's one of Le Carre's worst novels. I enjoyed, well, every other book he wrote but could never get all the way through that one cause it was so damn boring. It's a fairly good list, though, but would better be named "this dude's favorite books" rather than "the BEST books".

Recent topics in "Literacy Nerds"